Our Research Process
Every investigation begins with a clue—a local story, an old map, a private collection, an unusual landform, or a pattern hidden in disconnected data. We preserve those clues, place them in geographic and environmental context, and use modern analysis to develop questions that can be responsibly tested in the field.
01
We begin with information that formal research often misses: firsthand observations, private collections, historical sources, and overlooked clues in the landscape.
Observations from people who know a landscape become research leads—not conclusions.
We assemble the relevant formal and informal record before deciding what requires additional investigation.
Every report remains connected to its origin, context, and stated level of certainty.
02
Scattered clues become useful when they are organized into searchable, georeferenced records that can be compared across sources and landscapes.
Records are converted into a consistent structure without discarding their original context.
We model the environments in which evidence was deposited rather than relying only on the modern terrain.
Each record is connected to the environmental and historical conditions needed for meaningful comparison.
03
We use spatial analysis, remote sensing, and AI-assisted methods to identify recurring relationships and rank testable possibilities.
Independent data sources are examined for relationships that may not be visible when viewed separately.
Models identify probabilities and similarities—not archaeological or paleontological sites.
Every candidate is assessed against data quality, conflicting evidence, and plausible alternative explanations.
04
A model result remains a hypothesis until it is evaluated against physical evidence through permission-based, carefully documented fieldwork.
Research value is balanced with access, safety, sensitivity, and legal or ethical constraints.
Verification begins with non-destructive methods whenever possible.
Observations are preserved in context and referred for specialist review when findings warrant it.
Research Standards
Stories, models, and anomalies generate hypotheses. Physical evidence and context determine conclusions.
Every claim remains connected to its source, date, location, and stated level of certainty.
Private property is never entered or surveyed without explicit landowner authorization.
Uncertainty, incomplete data, conflicting evidence, and alternative explanations are documented.
Your observations contribute to scientific discovery. All reports are confidential.
Report a Find